Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Douglas McClenaghan's avatar

" It is no longer important to be good, but only to maintain the aesthetic of being good. It is only necessary that you have vibe and appearance and “feel” of a good person." This is frighteningly true. All surface, no substance. It's the words that matter; say the correct words because they are a magic spell.

Expand full comment
Haydn Harries's avatar

It might surprise you that at least one of your readers is in Generation Z. I do not know America, and what you say might be accurate there. But I do not recognise anything like it from my own experience; at the university where I am studying I have met no-one who passionately preaches wokery, unless one counts a few of the middle-aged lecturers pushing it at us.

It seems to me that my colleagues' main fault is not so much that they do not care about truth as that they do not think it attainable. They are sceptical, and about far more than religion: many are resigned to living without knowing or having reason to believe in anything.

I think your diagnosis is quite wrong: the woke do not possess the circular shield of faith pictured in the article. Their ideology is not working from its own strength, but from the weakness of any other ideology we can set against it. The loudest students might happen to be woke, but only because no-one can find anything else to be loud about.

But criticising wokery in articles like these seems to me a shallow trap for the deeper sort of mind. I would like to read more about what you do believe. If it is of any value, it will win more doubters away from the woke ideology than a hundred more articles like this. But if you go on writing articles simply criticising wokery, I see little value in subscribing to any of it.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts